Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #15 – July 11, 2024, 01:34:03 pm AFL 2024 Rd 16: Carlton vs RichmondThey challenged us and we responded in the best possible way.Trends:[1] There were 11 voters this round, which is pretty ordinary for a win over a team we all generally hate. Please do vote: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 9.91, which is almost an A. We haven't had many better this year, although last week's was on a whole other level.[3] 16 players managed a mention this week, which is still excellent. We had a lot of players who won their position and pretty much everybody did something significant to contribute. And we really did share the votes around![4] The average vote this week was 34!, even with us sharing the votes around! That is the 2nd best that I can recall, behind only last week.[5] 5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which equals our best. It shows how dominant we were in various phases.[6] Patrick Cripps managed a Judd-like 432 votes to be BOG this week, his 5th BOG for the season and his 11th time in the top three positions. Sam Walsh and Nic Newman filled the other two places. [7] Only One player managed votes from everyone this week; Patrick Cripps. Walsh and Newman missed one. [8] Our younger, less experienced players really stood up again, if not as prominent as they have been.[9] This was a game where all sectors of the team made significant contributions. The top 3 vote getters were mids, but the numbers were spread among the other places. It was lovely to see how even our contributions were. (I like writing this.)Votes:Patrick Cripps 432Newman, Nicholas 257Walsh, Sam 230Acres, Blake 135Fantasia, Orazio 104 His best game by a considerable margin.Saad, Adam 90Hollands, Elijah 68Cowan, Lachlan 41Fogarty, Lachlan 41Kennedy, Matthew 36McKay, Harrison 14Boyd, Jordan 14Kemp, Brodie 9Cerra, Adam 9McGovern, Mitchell 5Pittonet, Marc 5Progressive Votes:Patrick Cripps 3632Sam Walsh 2409Tom de Koning 2186Harry McKay 1507Jacob Weitering 1202Nic Newman 1160George Hewett 1022Blake Acres 1012Charlie Curnow 791Marc Pittonet 610Mitch McGovern 576Adam Saad 554Matthew Kennedy 535Elijah Hollands 507Alex Cincotta 415Zac Williams 330Brodie Kemp 328Matthew Owies 308Adam Cerra 271Jordan Boyd 204Matthew Cottrell 144Lachie Fogarty 135Orazio Fantasia 116Ollie Hollands 94Lachie Cowan 67Jack Carroll 64Lewis Young 60David Cuningham 13
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #16 – July 19, 2024, 09:33:53 pm AFL 2024 Rd 17: Carlton vs GWSVery disappointing. 1st quarter and last quarter were good. The rest were terrible.Trends:[1] There were 12 voters this round, which is par for the course when we lose. Please do vote: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 7.28, which is almost an D+. This isn't that bad, but considering we lost by 2 goals...[3] 13 players managed a mention this week, which, in the past, has been more than adequate. But for these days, when 15+ is the norm, it shows how ordinary we were. [4] The average vote this week was 24!, even with us sharing the votes around! That is 3rd worst for 2024.[5] 5 players managed 100 votes or more this week.[6] Patrick Cripps managed an impressive 340 votes to be BOG this week, his 6th BOG for the season and his 12th time in the top three positions. Matthew Kennedy and Harry McKay filled the other two places. [7] Three player managed votes from everyone this week; Patrick Cripps, Matthew Kennedy and Harry McKay. [8] Our younger, less experienced players were generally missing this round, with only Jordan Boyd making an impression.[9] This was a game where none of the sectors of the team made significant contributions. The top 3 vote getters were mids, and a key forward, where both those lines were down.Votes:Cripps, Patrick 340McKay, Harrison 170de Koning, Tom 164Kennedy, Matthew 158Newman, Nicholas 109Acres, Blake 42Saad, Adam 30William, Zac 30Boyd, Jordan 24Hollands, Elijah 6Cerra, Adam 6McGovern, Mitchell 6Weitering, Jacob 6Progressive Voting:Patrick Cripps 3971Sam Walsh 2409Tom de Koning 2349Harry McKay 1677Nic Newman 1269Jacob Weitering 1209Blake Acres 1054George Hewett 1022Charlie Curnow 791Matthew Kennedy 693Marc Pittonet 610Adam Saad 584Mitch McGovern 582Elijah Hollands 513Alex Cincotta 414Zac Williams 360Brodie Kemp 328Matthew Owies 308Adam Cerra 277Jordan Boyd 228Matthew Cottrell 144Lachlan Fogarty 135Orazio Fantasia 116Ollie Hollands 94Lachie Cowan 67Jack Carroll 64Lachie Young 60David Cuningham 13
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #17 – July 30, 2024, 08:44:12 pm AFL 2024 Rd 18: Carlton vs Western BulldogsVery disappointing. We didn't play at all well, but we hung in there. That we weren't blown away says a lot about how much we've improved over the last couple of years, even if we're all bitterly disappointed in the result.Trends:[1] There were 8 voters this round, which is the lowest I can remember. Granted that we lost, but a few more people putting in their opinions would be appreciated. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 5.95, which is almost an E. There was also a very large spread in the ratings; some of us were very dissatisfied, while others appreciated that we weren't thrashed. Hell, had Charlie could have kicked straight, we would have won, even with the poor play.[3] 13 players managed a mention this week, which, in the past, has been more than adequate. But for these days, when 15+ is the norm, it shows how ordinary we were. [4] The average vote this week was 26!, even with us sharing the votes around! That is 3rd worst for 2024.[5] 3 players managed 100 votes or more this week.[6] Patrick Cripps managed an impressive 351 votes to be BOG this week, his 7th BOG for the season and his 13th time in the top three positions. Weitering and Acres filled the other two places. [7] Two player managed votes from everyone this week; Patrick Cripps and Weitering. Acres missed from 1 voter.[8] Of our youngsters, only Elijah Hollands made an impression. [9] This was a game where none of the sectors of the team made significant contributions. The top 3 vote getters were a mid, a defender and a key forward, but only one from each.Votes:Cripps, Patrick 351Weitering, Jacob 190Acres, Blake 180Newman, Nicholas 85Curnow, Charles 71Cincotta, Alex 68McKay, Harrison 52Saad, Adam 47Hollands, Elijah 47Walsh, Sam 24de Koning, Tom 9Owies, Matthew 9Kemp, Brodie 5Progressive Voting:Patrick Cripps 4322Sam Walsh 2432Tom de Koning 2359Harry McKay 1729Jacob Weitering 1398Nic Newman 1354Blake Acres 1234George Hewett 1022Charlie Curnow 862Matthew Kennedy 693Adam Saad 632Marc Pittonet 610Mitch McGovern 582Elijah Hollands 560Alex Cincotta 481Zac Williams 360Brodie Kemp 333Matthew Owies 318Adam Cerra 277Jordan Boyd 228Matthew Cottrell 144Lachlan Fogarty 135Orazio Fantasia 116Ollie Hollands 94Lachie Cowan 67Jack Carroll 64Lewis Young 60David Cuningham 13
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #18 – July 31, 2024, 10:10:20 pm AFL 2024 Rd 19: Carlton vs North MelbourneWe won. We were good in patches, but not a 4 quarter effort.Trends:[1] There were 11 voters this round, which is very low for a win, even as unimpressive as this one was. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 8.61, which is almost an B-. There was also a very large spread in the ratings; some of us were still dissatisfied.[3] 16 players managed a mention this week. This is becoming the norm, something I am not disappointed about. [4] The average vote this week was 29, which is the lowest for a win all season.[5] 5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which just hasn't happened until recently. I think it is a very positive sign.[6] Patrick Cripps managed an impressive 336 votes to be BOG this week, his 8th BOG for the season and his 14th time in the top three positions and his 3rd BOG in a row! George Hewett and Charlie Curnow filled the other two places. [7] One player managed votes from everyone this week; Patrick Cripps. [8] Of our youngsters, a couple made minor contributions. Not bad efforts, but I'd like one or two of our youngsters to make a match-winning contribution sometimes. It would take the heat of guys like Cripps and Walsh. [9] Our mids were probably he most significant, although Curnow and Weitering really showed out at either end.Votes:Cripps, Patrick 336Hewett, George 203Curnow, Charles 153Saad, Adam 133Weitering, Jacob 121Cottrell, Matthew 59de Koning, Tom 47Newman, Nicholas 43Fogarty, Lachlan 39Hollands, Oliver 35Walsh, Sam 31Owies, Matthew 27Motlop, Jesse 20Hollands, Elijah 16Carroll, Jack 16Cerra, Adam 12Progressive Voting:Patrick Cripps 4658Sam Walsh 2064Tom de Koning 2406Harry McKay 1729Jacob Weitering 1509Nic Newman 1397Blake Acres 1234George Hewett 1225Charlie Curnow 1015Adam Saad 765Matthew Kennedy 693Marc Pittonet 610Mitch McGovern 582Elijah Hollands 576Alex Cincotta 481Zac Williams 360Matthew Owies 345Brodie Kemp 333Adam Cerra 289Jordan Boyd 228Matthew Cottrell 203Lachlan Fogarty 174Oliver Hollands 129Orazio Fantasia 116Jack Carroll 79Lachlan Cowan 67Lewis Young 60Jesse Motlop 20David Cuningham 13
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #19 – August 04, 2024, 02:18:09 pm AFL 2024 Rd 20: Carlton vs Port AdelaideNot good enough. We made Port look 2nd rate during the 2nd quarter, but the rest of the game ...Trends:[1] There were 10 voters this round, whioch wasn;t too bad considering how we lost. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 6.70, which is almost an D-. There was also a very large spread in the ratings; some of us were very dissatisfied.[3] 14 players managed a mention this week. This is becoming the norm, something I am not disappointed about. [4] The average vote this week was 22, which is low. Not many voters, so not many votes.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which was positive.[6] Charlie Curnow managed 275 votes to be BOG this week, his 1st BOG for the season and only the 2nd time in the top three positionsfor this season! Cripps and Weitering filled the other two places. [7] One player managed votes from everyone this week: Charlie Curnow. Cripps missed from 1 voter, Weitering missed from 2.[8] Elijah Hollands was the main youngster to make a decent contribution. The rest were pretty quiet, but a lot of players were not as significant as they could be.[9] No line dominated. One key defender, one mid and one forward stood out. More defenders did something, but the ball was in their region too often.Votes:Curnow, Charles 275Cripps, Patrick 181Weitering, Jacob 161Walsh, Sam 50Newman, Nicholas 47Hewett, George 47Hollands, Elijah 47McGovern, Mitchell 37Kennedy, Matthew 27Pittonet, Marc 23Young, Lewis 13Saad, Adam 7Cerra, Adam 7Kemp, Brodie 3Progressive Votes:Patrick Cripps 4839Sam Walsh 2571Tom de Koning 2406Harry McKay 1729Jacob Weitering 1680Nic Newman 1448Charlie Curnow 1290George Hewett 1272Blake Acres 1234Adam Saad 771Matthew Kennedy 730Marc Pittonet 634Mitch McGovern 629Elijah Hollands 621Alex Cincotta 481Zac Williams 360Matthew Owies 345Brodie Kemp 336Adam Cerra 296Jordan Boyd 228Matthew Cottrell 203Lachie Fogarty 174Ollie Hollands 129Orazio Fantasia 116Jack Carroll 79Lewis Young 73Lachie Cowan 67Jesse Motlop 20David Cuningham 13
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #20 – August 16, 2024, 08:50:22 pm AFL 2024 Rd 21: Carlton vs CollingwoodAnother game we should have won, but didn't. Very frustrating.Trends:[1] There were 9 voters this round, which was disappointing. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate.[2] The rating was a 7.63, which is almost an C-. There was also a very large spread in the ratings; some of us were very dissatisfied.[3] 15 players managed a mention this week. This is becoming the norm, something I am not disappointed about. [4] The average vote this week was 26, which is low. Not many voters, so not many votes.[5] 5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which was positive. We usually win with such contributions. [6] George Hewett and Patrick Cripps tied for top spot this week, both managing 220 votes. [7] One player managed votes from everyone this week: George Hewett. Cripps missed from 1 voter, as did Weitering and Elijah Hollands.[8] Elijah Hollands was the main youngster to make a decent contribution. The rest were pretty quiet, but a lot of players were not as significant as they could be.[9] Our forwards didn't have a lot of impact this week. Most votes came from the midfield and defence.Votes:Cripps, Patrick 220Hewett, George 220Weitering, Jacob 136Hollands, Elijah 119McGovern, Mitchell 102Newman, Nicholas 76Kemp, Brodie 58Walsh, Sam 51Saad, Adam 34Motlop, Jesse 34Fogarty, Lachlan 25Acres, Blake 25Hollands, Oliver 17Kennedy, Matthew 13Martin, Jack 4Progressive Voting:Patrick Cripps 5060Sam Walsh 2622Tom de Koning 2406Jacob Weitering 1815Harry McKay 1729Nic Newman 1524George Hewett 1492Charlie Curnow 1290Blake Acres 1260Adam Saad 805Matthew Kennedy 742Elijah Hollands 741Mitch McGovern 731Marc Pittonet 634Alex Cincotta 481Brodie Kemp 404Zac Williams 360Matthew Owies 345Adam Cerra 296Jordan Boyd 228Matthew Cottrell 203Lachlan Fogarty 199Oliver Hollands 146Orazio Fantasia 113Jack Carroll 79Lewis Young 73Lachlan Cowan 67Jesse Motlop 54David Cuningham 13Jack Martin 4
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #21 – August 23, 2024, 06:29:23 pm AFL 2024 Rd 22: Carlton vs HawthornOur worst performance for the year. Losing half a dozen players didn't help either.Trends:[1] There were 6 voters this round, which is the equal lowest in my time doing this. Granted that we were terrible, but we really need more voters. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate. It makes our statistics more reliable. It is a part of the CSC experience.[2] The rating was a 5.11, which is an F. This sort of score hasn't been seen since the 'bad old days'.[3] 12 players managed a mention this week. In past years, this wouldn't be bad, but in these days of efforts from most players, it is low.[4] The average vote this week was 17. I've never seen an average score this low. [5] 2 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which was very low. Not many voters, not many scores.[6] Matthew Kennedy stood out for top spot this week, managing 294 votes. [7][limegreen]Two[/color][/b] player managed votes from everyone this week: Kennedy and Acres[8] Ollie Hollands was the main youngster to make a decent contribution. Lachie Cowan wasn't bad either.[9] Our forwards didn't have a lot of impact this week. Most votes came from the midfield and defence.Votes:Kennedy, Matthew 294Acres, Blake 128Cripps, Patrick 77Hollands, Oliver 77Newman, Nicholas 51Cowan, Lachlan 34Hewett, George 30Pittonet, Marc 26Weitering, Jacob 17Walsh, Sam 17Saad, Adam 9McKay, Harrison 9Progressive voting:Patrick Cripps 5136Sam Walsh 2639Tom de Koning 2406Jacob Weitering 1833Harry McKay 1738Nic Newman 1575George Hewett 1522Blake Acres 1387Charlie Curnow 1290Matthew Kennedy 1036Adam Saad 814Elijah Hollands 741Mitch McGovern 731Marc Pittonet 659Alex Cincotta 481Brodie Kemp 404Zac Williams 360Matthew Owies 345Adam Cerra 296Jordan Boyd 228Ollie Hollands 223Matthew Cottrell 203Lachie Fogarty 199Orazio Fantasia 116Lachie Cowan 101Jack Carroll 79Lewis Young 73Jesse Motlop 53David Cuningham 13Jack Martin 5 Last Edit: August 23, 2024, 08:06:50 pm by crashlander 1 Likes
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #22 – August 23, 2024, 07:22:47 pm I didn’t vote for the Hawthorn game Crash. I had another commitment that prevented me from watching the game live and I just couldn’t bring myself to watch a replay. It was the first game I’ve not watched in many years.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #23 – August 23, 2024, 08:08:11 pm Quote from: DJC on August 23, 2024, 07:22:47 pmI didn’t vote for the Hawthorn game Crash. I had another commitment that prevented me from watching the game live and I just couldn’t bring myself to watch a replay. It was the first game I’ve not watched in many years. I don't blame you. I miss sometimes when we lose. I can't stand to watch the replay either. And if ever there was a reason for not watching us, this round was it.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2024 Reply #24 – August 29, 2024, 09:01:14 pm AFL 2024 Rd 23: Carlton vs West CoastConsidering the players we had out and that we played over in Perth, this was a win for the ages. We so smashed the Weagles that they didn't even turn up the next week after having 3 wins on the trot.Trends:[1] There were 14 voters this round, which is more than double last week and nearly double the same round last year. Please do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate. It makes our statistics more reliable. It is a part of the CSC experience.[2] The rating was a 9.93, which is an A. This is the 3rd highest rating for the year.[3] 15 players managed a mention this week. It is probably par for the course these days, but it is a huge improvement over last week.[4] The average vote this week was 30, which is more than respectable.[5] 5 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which is more like it. [6] Patrick Cripps stood out for top spot this week, managing 475 votes, the largest score of the season and really Judd-esque. Hewett was 2nd with 273 votes.[7]Two[/b] player managed votes from everyone this week: Cripps and Kemp. Hewett and Pittonet missed from one voter.[8] Our youngsters made a mark this week. Kemp got over 100 votes. Elijah and Ollie Hollands also were significant votes getters. Cowan got a couple as well, as did Corey Durdin.[9] Votes were spread around all zones this week, although the mids did best. Our mids were dominant.Votes:Cripps, Patrick 475Hewett, George 273Kemp, Brodie 170Pittonet, Marc 149Weitering, Jacob 145Hollands, Oliver 60Hollands, Elijah 60Kennedy, Matthew 53Newman, Nicholas 46Cincotta, Alex 25Walsh, Sam 11Cowan, Lachlan 7Owies, Matthew 7Acres, Blake 4 Durdin, Corey 4Progressive Votes:Patrick Cripps 5612Sam Walsh 2649Tom de Koning 2406Jacob Weitering 1978George Hewett 1795Harry McKay 1738Nic Newman 1621Blake Acres 1391Charlie Curnow 1290Matthew Kennedy 1089Adam Saad 814Marc Pittonet 808Elijah Hollands 801Mitch McGovern 731Brodie Kemp 574Alex Cincotta 506Zac Williams 360Matthew Owies 352Adam Cerra 296Ollie Hollands 283Jordan Boyd 228Matthew Cottrell 203Lachie Fogarty 199Orazio Fantasia 116Lachie Cowan 108Jack Carroll 79Lewis Young 73Jesse Motlop 54David Cuningham 13Jack Martin 5Corey Durdin 4
Topic: Jim Park Analysis 2024 (Read 11481 times)
previous topic - next topic
Topic: Jim Park Analysis 2024 (Read 11481 times)
previous topic - next topic